Invitation to the research colloquium of the Institute for Society, Knowledge and Politics: How to know a national park? Monitoring practices and the enactment of biodiversity in Neusiedler See – Seewinkel National Park Austria. Ass.-Prof.Dr. Erik Aarden am 28. November 2024 von 15:15-16:45 Uhr im S.2.05

How to know a national park? Monitoring practices and the enactment of biodiversity in Neusiedler See – Seewinkel National Park, Austria

To confront the ongoing global ‘biodiversity crisis’ various international agreements have presented ambitious aims for the preservation and restoration of threatened ecosystems. Entwined with these aims, different categories of protected areas have long been seen as a key conservation tool. Yet to know if and how the designation and management of protected areas affect the status of vulnerable habitats and species requires regular, ongoing monitoring of such areas. Forming a particular form of knowledge production related to an issue of great social and political concern, monitoring as such has nevertheless received comparatively little (conceptual) attention in science and technology studies (STS). In this presentation, I therefore explore how particular scientific and cultural readings of nature are tied together to shape monitoring as a knowledge practice in the context of Neusiedler See – Seewinkel National Park in Austria. I present ethnographic data on different ecosystem and species-based monitoring programs to demonstrate how these generate particular forms of ecological knowledge across temporal and spatial scales. I will argue that the calibration of monitoring practices at particular places and times with broader framings of biodiversity do not only produce matters of fact on conservation in the national park, but also generate more complex narratives on the interweaving of nature and culture that shapes biodiversity’.

New Book on an Ecological Village and Democratic Bureaucracy in China

Christof Lammer’s fine-grained ethnography describes the complexity of political processes in an eco-village in Sichuan. The usual pigeonholing of the Chinese state does not work here. An exciting read for anyone interested in how images of authoritarian, socialist and cultural otherness shape social policy and the transition to ecological agriculture.

Lammer, Christof. 2024. Performing State Boundaries: Food Networks, Democratic Bureaucracy and China. New York: Berghahn Books.

For his research, social anthropologist Christof Lammer lived for over a year in a village that was part of an alternative food network in Sichuan Province. The village had founded a cooperative to convert to ecological agriculture in the 2010s. This transition was initiated by Dong Jie. He was simultaneously valued as part of global civil society, esteemed part of rural community, and praised as a good state agronomist. This allowed him to secure the support of actors with different political ideas: organized urban middle-class consumers, activist scholars and the local government. Based on this observation, Christof develops an innovative approach to the anthropology of the state, which understands the performative boundary work between state, civil society, and family in its multiplicity and materiality.

One day during his stay in the eco-village, all existing minimum livelihood allowances in the county were suddenly canceled and citizens had to reapply for these benefits. This “standardization” was justified not only by “too much” kinship – “corruption” – but also by “too little” kinship and the supposed loss of traditional Chinese values ​​– “the lack of household responsibility”. While this standardization affected the lives of the former recipients, it offered Christof the rare opportunity to observe the democratic administration of the reapplication process. His ethnography shows how performative boundary work between state and kinship could turn similar practices into individualism, traditional familism or corruption and thus decided about access to the social benefits.

“This book is of interest not just to scholars studying China but more generally to social scientists, particularly to social anthropologists to whom it advocates the infusion of the political to the study of kinship. It is well organised and suitable for courses on the local state in the PRC and the anthropology of the state.”
Stephan Feuchtwang, London School of Economics and Political Science

“An excellent example of an ethnographically grounded theoretical work. It offers a useful and dense overview of the anthropology of the state, advances cutting-edge questions and counterbalances the Orientalist othering of China.”
Klāvs Sedlenieks, Rīga Stradiņš University

 

For upcoming book talks (also online!) please click here.

Thanks to the generous support of the University of Klagenfurt and its Department of Society, Knowledge and Politics, the entire book is available online (open access):

https://www.berghahnbooks.com/title/LammerPerforming

* * *

Christof Lammer is a social anthropologist based at the Department of Society, Knowledge and Politics, University of Klagenfurt, and a fellow at Humboldt University of Berlin’s Centre for Advanced Studies inherit – heritage in transformation. He has co-edited special issues on ‘Measuring Kinship: Gradual Belonging and Thresholds of Exclusion’ (2021, Social Analysis) and ‘Infrastructures of Value: New and Historical Materialities in Agriculture’ (2024, Ethnos). He is also a co-organizer of the Scientific Network ‘Anthropology and China(s)’ (2021–2025).

 

 

New Publication in Special Issue on Labour and Welfare in the Global South

In his contribution to this special issue of Global Social Policy, Christof Lammer examines social policy as a knowledge process and shows how the minimum livelihood guarantee (dibao) in China and its relationship to labour changes not only through human actors’ intentions but through the sociotechnical materiality of bureaucratic targeting methods.

The relationship between labour and social policy is at the heart of the social question. Scholars often treat this link as either a causal relation out there or a conceptual connection in policy makers’ minds. This article examines its sociotechnical materiality instead. Christof Lammer follows political anthropologists who ask how bureaucrats practice policy and scholars of science and technology studies who explore how social and technical aspects are interrelated in knowledge processes.

China studies has suggested that the minimum livelihood guarantee (dibao) was originally designed as a market-oriented response to transformations of labour such as mass layoffs, peasant proletarianisation and associated unrest but later revamped to only combat extreme poverty – similar to earlier forms of social assistance during the Mao era. Ethnographic insights into dibao policy in a village in Sichuan show how its designed links to labour were erased and transformed through different methods of bureaucratic targeting, as well as expectations about the bureaucratic ability to know. For a time, dibao was even integrated into alternative rural development projects aimed at decommodification.

Studying social policy as a knowledge process uncovers how its sociotechnical links to labour reconfigure it as an answer to the social question.

* * *

Lammer, Christof. 2024. „Social Policy as Knowledge Process: How Its Sociotechnical Links to Labour Reconfigure the Social Question.“ Global Social Policy 24(2): 166–184, https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181231210158.

Published in the Special Issue: “Reconfiguring Labour and Welfare in the Global South: How the Social Question is Framed as Market Participation”, edited by Minh Nguyen, Helle Rydstrom and Jingyu Mao.

Christof Lammer is a social anthropologist based at the Department of Society, Knowledge and Politics at the University of Klagenfurt. Currently he is a fellow at Humboldt University of Berlin’s Centre for Advanced Studies inherit – heritage in transformation.

inherit fellowship at HU Berlin for Christof Lammer

From April 2024 to March 2025, Christof Lammer will be researching at the Humboldt University of Berlin how kinship measurements make giant pandas a natural heritage worth protecting.

The social anthropologist Christof Lammer, postdoc assistant at the Department of Society, Knowledge & Politics at the University of Klagenfurt, was invited to a one-year fellowship at HU Berlin by the newly founded centre for advanced studies Käte Hamburger Kolleg inherit – Heritage in Transformation. There he is working on the project “Panda Heritage: Kinship Measurements and Life’s Value in Species Conservation”. In doing so, he deepens his interest in the political and economic consequences of kinship measurements and in the material production of value through information infrastructures.

What makes nature valuable and worth protecting as “heritage”? In the case of species conservation efforts, Christof assumes that kinship measurements play a central role when people decide which species and individuals should be protected – and which not.

His previous research has already shown that people measure kinship in different ways in order to decide about human belonging (e.g. citizenship), rights (e.g. inheritance, social benefits and insurance payouts) and obligations (e.g. alimony and care). Kinship is measured using overlapping and competing indicators, such as genealogical distance, lived closeness, phenotypic similarity or genetic dissimilarity.

The giant panda is a particularly interesting species for exploring how humans also employ measurements of kinship to determine origin, belonging and life’s value in species conservation. Pandas are symbol of global conservation efforts and protected as world heritage in wildlife sanctuaries, but also claimed by the People’s Republic of China as national treasure and used for so-called panda diplomacy.

For Panda Heritage, Christof analyses historical and contemporary sources of panda research and interviews involved natural scientists. The aim is to map the overlapping and competing kinship measurements that are used to delineate the panda from other species and determine its place in the evolutionary tree of life, to inform panda matchmaking to preserve genetic diversity, and habitat modelling and care practices to enable “rewilding”.

Thereby it promises insights into how seemingly unremarkable kinship measurements not only justify the protection of natural heritage but also shape conservation interventions that also affect the lives of humans and other companion species.

Panda Heritage on the inherit website: https://inherit.hu-berlin.de/projects/panda-heritage-kinship-measurements-and-lifes-value-in-species-conservation